On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 3:03:38 PM UTC-7, Francis Avila wrote:
>
> A higher-order function can do what this macro does:
> https://gist.github.com/favila/ecdd031e22426b93a78f
>
Oh nice! It looks like I came up with an almost identical solution:
(defn transducing
[f]
(fn [reducing-fn]
(fn
([] (reducing-fn))
([result] (reducing-fn result))
([result input] (f result input reducing-fn)))))
It feels like "writing a custom transducer" should be a common use case, is
there anything like these functions we've written that exists in the core
library? I didn't see anything like them there or in the reducers library
when I first started on my project.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
