> > I think you can do what you want with existing transducers. Won't > map/filter/keep/etc do the trick? >
I can't say for sure that it's not possible, but I certainly lack the imagination :). The logic I need to write is quite complicated and I'm finding it's easier to write my own transducer to have fine-grained control. My $0.02 is only resort to macros when all else has failed. Can just higher > order functions and composition and injection get you closer to what you > want? > This seems to be very common feedback on this group, and I'll definitely take it to heart. Mostly I just wanted to check my understanding of macros and verify that what I want to do is / is not possible using them before moving on to higher order functions. You can "capture" symbols from the surrounding context, making them > available to the body of your macros, the "tilde tick trick" is what you're > looking for there Ah perfect! This is exactly what I was hoping would be possible. Your examples are right on point, thanks for educating me :) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
