Rich has ok'ed this and I've added a jira for this at http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1951. The predicate is trivial of course - but we would want to add generator support and that's trickier as test.check doesn't have anything for this. I'm putting it on the back burner for now, but if anyone wants to think about that - comment on the ticket.
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 6:51:47 AM UTC-5, Remo Koch wrote: > > Same here, would be nice to have `biginteger?` in core as well. > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 7:13:14 AM UTC+2, puzzler wrote: >> >> Also non-scientific: I personally use BigInteger a fair amount, but have >> never needed to use BigDecimal. >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:41 PM, <se...@corfield.org> wrote: >> >>> As a completely non-scientific data point, we had precisely one place in >>> our 30k+ lines of code where we can use bigdec? And there is also precisely >>> one place we could use biginteger? 😊 >>> >>> >>> >>> Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN >>> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Alex Miller >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 7, 2016 7:56 PM >>> *To: *Clojure >>> *Subject: *Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5 >>> >>> >>> >>> Not sure, I can ask. I think BigDecimal is probably used way more than >>> BigInteger. >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: >>> >>> Whilst updating our code, I noticed there’s bigdec? to test for >>> java.math.BigDecimal but not bigint? or biginteger? >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there a specific reason for that omission or were those just missed? >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
