On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 00:31:41 UTC+5:30, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> I'm not opposed to it but can't say that's anywhere on my priority list. 
> Does anyone use incubator?
>

Just to add a data point, I use incubator at work for `dissoc-in`.

Shantanu
 

>
>
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:21:34 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote:
>>
>> An excellent set of new predicates – thank you!
>>
>>  
>>
>> Will clojure.core.incubator get a new release to reflect that seqable? is 
>> available in core?
>>
>>  
>>
>> WARNING: seqable? already refers to: #'clojure.core/seqable? in 
>> namespace: clojure.core.incubator, being replaced by: 
>> #'clojure.core.incubator/seqable?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
>> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>>
>> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
>> -- Margaret Atwood
>>
>>  
>>
>> On 6/7/16, 10:38 AM, "Alex Miller" <clo...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
>> on behalf of al...@puredanger.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>> Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5 is now available.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Try it via
>>
>>  
>>
>> - Download:
>>  https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha5 
>> <https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha5>
>>
>> - Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha5"]
>>
>>  
>>
>> 1.9.0-alpha4 includes the following changes since 1.9.0-alpha4:
>>
>>  
>>
>> Fixes:
>>
>> - doc was printing "Spec" when none existed
>>
>> - fix ? explain
>>
>>  
>>
>> New predicates in core (all also now have built-in generator support in 
>> spec):
>>
>> - seqable?
>>
>> - boolean?
>>
>> - long?, pos-long?, neg-long?, nat-long?
>>
>> - double?, bigdec?
>>
>> - ident?, simple-ident?, qualified-ident?
>>
>> - simple-symbol?, qualified-symbol?
>>
>> - simple-keyword?, qualified-keyword?
>>
>> - bytes? (for byte[])
>>
>> - indexed?
>>
>> - inst? (and new inst-ms)
>>
>> - uuid?
>>
>> - uri?
>>
>>  
>>
>> New in spec:
>>
>> - unform - given a spec and a conformed value, returns the unconformed 
>> value
>>
>> - New preds: long-in-range?, inst-in-range?
>>
>> - New specs (with gen support): long-in, inst-in, double-in
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to