On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 5:45:47 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > We have 1.9.0 Alpha 1 in QA at World Singles and plan to start using > clojure.spec this week. We’ve gone to production on Alpha builds ever since > 1.3 and almost never had any problems (in five years – time has flown > past!). > > > > What sort of tradeoffs have you in mind regarding whether to use > clojure.spec or not? I ask because I’m thinking about adding an optional > namespace to clojure.java.jdbc that would provide fn-specs for that library > – my assumption is that folks not yet using a 1.9.0 build would simply not > require that spec namespace… >
Well if you want to validate your data and functions then I think using clojure.spec would be useful. :) If you want to check them at runtime then there is obviously a performance cost in doing so. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
