On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:01 PM, <s...@corfield.org> wrote: > Bear in mind that you can catch the exception thrown by a > pre-/post-condition so printing to stdout is not the right behavior. >
Ah, I didn't realize that it was okay to throw an error inside a pre-/post-condition test, but that makes sense. > > > Are you thinking about something like this? > > > > (when-not (s/valid? spec arg) > > (throw (AssertionError. (with-out-str (s/explain spec arg)) > > (ex-info “SpecFailure” (s/explain-data spec > arg))))) > > > > > So yes, this looks like exactly the kind of thing I would like to have a convenient name for, for easy use inside a pre or post condition. Maybe `assert-valid` would be a good name. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
