I generally agree with this suggestion, I just want to point out that, if incorporated with your previous suggestion of using `double` primitive type hints, using `.-x` vs `:x` to acess the field will make a difference: the former will access the primitive field while the latter will cause it to get boxed
> On 12 May 2016, at 21:23, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> wrote: > > In general, it is considered bad form to use the java interop features to > construct or access fields of a record. Preferred: > > (defn rv+ > [v1 v2] > (->v2r (+ (:x v1) (:x v2)) > (+ (:y v1) (:y v2)))) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
