On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Nicola Mometto <brobro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Static types wouln't have helped at all in this case. Types are about > correctness, not performances. This comment was needless
Here I thought maybe knowing when something was or was not something could have been useful in, you know, making the code (benchmarks in this case) actually do what the author wanted it to be doing. Silly me. I will always have my fingers crossed for core.typed. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
