Thank you. That the point. If "recur" binds to fn, why it can not know the binding point as the function method based on the number of arguments passed to it? I mean it is clear that Clojure can't do that, but I can see no reason why it could or should not if we choose to implement such syntactic nicety as recur in a function
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
