Understood! I am certainly not diving in to submit pull requests to add 
features.

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 10:43:25 AM UTC-6, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> It may be as finished as it will ever be.
>
> Andy
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:35 AM, James Elliott <brun...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see that part of the reason it’s not yet documented is that it’s 
>> not really finished; you can’t, for example, use a keyword as a function 
>> with it. Trying to use #=(:tap-tempo control-buttons) as a case target 
>> fails with clojure.lang.Keyword cannot be cast to clojure.lang.Symbol. I 
>> guess I will give up on it until/unless it gets finished and becomes 
>> official. :)
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 9:49:57 PM UTC-6, James Elliott wrote:
>>>
>>> Quite dissonant, I mean, derp.
>>>
>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 9:49:28 PM UTC-6, James Elliott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I see… interesting. What would it take to achieve commitment? :) I 
>>>> humbly submit that it feels qiote dissonant to stumble across something 
>>>> like this in a language that is attaining such wide adoption as Clojure is 
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 8:53:45 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Rich has never committed to officially making this part of Clojure so 
>>>>> it has been left as an undocumented feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:33:44 PM UTC-6, James Elliott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I learned recently <http://stackoverflow.com/a/15332367/802383> that 
>>>>>> you can tell the reader to evaluate a function at read time, if you want 
>>>>>> some potentially costly operation that you know will result in a 
>>>>>> constant 
>>>>>> value to be done just once, rather than every time the surrounding form 
>>>>>> is 
>>>>>> evaluated, by prefixing it with the reader macro #= and I found this 
>>>>>> surprising. Shouldn’t this be documented in the Reader reference 
>>>>>> <http://clojure.org/reference/reader>?
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to