Quite dissonant, I mean, derp. On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 9:49:28 PM UTC-6, James Elliott wrote: > > Oh, I see… interesting. What would it take to achieve commitment? :) I > humbly submit that it feels qiote dissonant to stumble across something > like this in a language that is attaining such wide adoption as Clojure is > now. > > On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 8:53:45 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Rich has never committed to officially making this part of Clojure so it >> has been left as an undocumented feature. >> >> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:33:44 PM UTC-6, James Elliott wrote: >>> >>> I learned recently <http://stackoverflow.com/a/15332367/802383> that >>> you can tell the reader to evaluate a function at read time, if you want >>> some potentially costly operation that you know will result in a constant >>> value to be done just once, rather than every time the surrounding form is >>> evaluated, by prefixing it with the reader macro #= and I found this >>> surprising. Shouldn’t this be documented in the Reader reference >>> <http://clojure.org/reference/reader>? >>> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
