On 3 August 2015 at 23:47, Rob Lally <rob.la...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m also a little confused by your suggestion that it would be impossible > to enclose each test in a transaction. The article you point to shows one > way.
It shows how to pass data to the test by using a dynamic var, which is what we are using to track the connection, which is what I'm interested in passing in to the test. If my solution to use a dynamic var to track the connection is dirty and unacceptable, so is that one. The only difference I can think of is, using a dynamic var only for tests dirties only tests but using a dynamic var to track connections is consistent across the code-base. -- J. Pablo Fernández <pup...@pupeno.com> (http://pupeno.com) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
