I disagree with the premise entirely. I think that the Clojure community has just done a better job of building smaller, more modular tooling. And this is frankly something I prefer, and find refreshing in the Clojure sphere (as compared with my previous Rails webdev experience).
Note that to put things on the same footing, you'd want to be noting that Luminus depend on Ring and Compojure, with commit counts 761 and 865 resp, and contributor counts 73 and 29 resp. I'm not saying that Clojure can't improve it's offering in web dev with added libraries etc, but I wouldn't want to see us move away from the modularity with which we've built things, because I think it's a win. Just my 2 c Chris Small -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
