Yes, I'll get that in the next release, I forgot to put it in there...

On Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 6:45:07 PM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> I believe that change is due to this commit from early March 2015: 
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/692645c73c86d12c93a97c858dc6e8b0f4280a0b
>
> Nicola Mometto had opened a ticket CLJ-1593 for this issue: 
> http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1593
> The commit did not reference the ticket, but Nicola noticed the commit and 
> closed the ticket due to that commit.
>
> Alex, would it be appropriate to include a reference to CLJ-1593 in the 
> Clojure 1.7 release notes?
>
> Andy
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Ian Rumford <rumfo...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex, All,
>>
>> An observation really.
>>
>> I've just noticed that a literal map e.g. (def m {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3}) in 
>> alpha6 is an array map not hash map.  
>>
>> In 1.6.0 and 1.7.0-alpha5  its a hash map.
>>
>> Couldn't find any obvious statement in the release notes but interested 
>> in the background to the change.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to