Thanks to all for your good points! Sorry for the delay answering but I needed to review the docs first, now I'll try to be brave and summarise here Graph vs Component features and/or properties ...
1. *graph* and *component* solve "dependency injection" 2. *component* solves "state management" (Lifecyle protocol and SystemMap record) 3. *component* comes with "reloaded workflow" 4. *graph* lets you "analyze, change and compose" your functional computation 5. *component* forces you to use defrecord Ok, so I'm convinced now that component is great for state management! ... but, *how can you "analyze, change and compose" the internals (functional computation) of your defrecords???* I mean that component lib is really great for composing your system (and repl development including mocking components!) but forces you to use closed component that others projects can't *easily* extend [1] or change, so for example, which would be the good pattern to follow if you need monitoring/logging your system in *component (*having that defrecord limitation)? what do you think if you *write your components using graph*? So we keep + system composable using component + component composable using graph => example code here <https://github.com/milesian/system-examples/blob/318f58383a7a4917c08147c3d0023e5bd5d93af8/src/milesian/graph_example.clj> Thanks again! Juan [1] This was my own newbie attempt to extend defrecords tangrammer/defrecord-wrapper <https://github.com/tangrammer/defrecord-wrapper> , and milesian/aop <https://github.com/milesian/aop> the component integration one El miércoles, 4 de febrero de 2015, 13:46:33 (UTC+1), Juan A. Ruz @tangrammer escribió: > > Hi guys! > > Can anyone give some insight on the features or downsides of choosing > component vs graph libs? > > Or maybe explain the advantages of using defrecords instead of plain fns? > > thanks in advance! > Juan > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.