On 27 December 2014 at 19:10:38, Jozef Wagner (jozef.wag...@gmail.com) wrote: > clj-time seems to be naming protocols inconsistently. It uses > ISomething, Something and SomethingProtocol naming.
I suspect it is because it has 60 contributors and most users never have to extend the protocols. Feel free to submit a PR that standardises all names on Something. -- @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
