On Saturday, December 20, 2014 12:53:41 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Irving wrote: > > It's not a docstring then, just the first expression in the body. >
Leading to the interesting question: is the compiler smart enough to optimize it away? A string literal has no side effects so if its return value is unused the compiler *can* do so, but *does* it? Obviously, though, if you're going to put a comment where tooling won't pick it up as a docstring you should just use ; and thereby *ensure* it will compile away to nothing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
