On Saturday, December 20, 2014 9:30:47 AM UTC-5, tbc++ wrote: > > I recently browsed parts of that guide and was surprised how many bits I > disagreed with. Especially around the "one space in these rare cases" bits. > Not that that is a bad thing it's just my personal opinion that everything > should always use two space indentation. > > And on a client project recently, it was decided (when I wasn't around) > that the arguments to a function should always be on a newline: > > (defn foo > [x] > (+ x x)) > > Instead of: > > (defn foo [x] > (+ x x)) > > I disagree with this idea also, but whatever, it's just style. It's not > like I suddenly can't read Clojure code since it's in the wrong style. >
My own tendency is to put the arglist inline with the defn foo iff it's the only arity and there's no docstring. If there are several arities each starts on a line by itself. And if there's a docstring, it's defn foo <newline> docstring <newline> arglist... Of course, since I aggressively document most functions (even non-publics) I don't tend to use the inline arrangement very often, except on local functions: (fn [x y] (map do-something x (map inc y)))... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
