On Sunday, 7 December 2014 02:01:33 UTC-5, eric wrote: > > Interesting, I think this here goes along the same lines: > https://github.com/logaan/promise-stream > >
Cool, I'll check that out. Hadn't seen that one before. I was also happy to see Rich Hickey talking about the upcoming Promise Channels in his recent Clojure/conj talk. So your motivations seem all good but I have a gut feeling that by > embracing Elm you are painting yourself in a corner. As in, it seems neat > but eventually you hit some brick wall that can't be overcome and you > realize you have to go back and take off into yet another direction. I have > refrained from going down the Elm path for that reason. > Let's say the worst-case scenario is that there's actually no good way to do large applications using Elm-style FRP top-to-bottom. Even if that ends up being the case, those static signal graphs are still really nice for managing the state of individual components of an application. Having a number of distinct graphs connected by some other means of managing state still seems like a good situation to me and something worth pursuing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
