Unfortunately startup time of ClojureCLR is much worse because it targets DLR.
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:16:19 PM UTC+1, Michael Klishin wrote: > > On 12 November 2014 at 21:50:57, Evan Zamir (zamir...@gmail.com > <javascript:>) wrote: > > I just read that MS is open sourcing .NET. I assume this means > > one could now target .NET with ClojureCLR on Linux/Mac environment. > > Assuming that is true, the natural question seems to be which > > VM should a Clojure developer be targeting? Is performance going > > to be similar on both? In that case, then existing libraries & > > dependencies would be the deciding factor? Thanks for opinions. > > Mono has been around for a while and as far as ClojureCLR goes, > shouldn't have any [obvious] limitations. In fact, when I have to > touch .NET these days, I do all the work on Mono and then simply > verify things against .NET on Windows. Usually works like a charm. > > Mono performance has been excellent for what I do and .NET/Mono startup > time is so much better than the JVM one that often now choose F# > for scripting. > > Again, I haven't tried ClojureCLR but running .NET languages on > OS X and Linux has been perfectly possible for years. > -- > @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
