On Friday, October 10, 2014 5:20:30 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: > > Maybe an ideal world would be one in which there was a global setting to > turn laziness on and off. When you want it, have it, and know your risks. > After looking at the source for some of the lazy functions, I've come to > suspect that such a feature would be completely nontrivial. >
Oh, wait, Rich Hickey's blog post about transducers <http://blog.cognitect.com/blog/2014/8/6/transducers-are-coming> says: *But transducers can also be used for: a la carte laziness ... collection/iteration/laziness-free transforming reductions * Not certain what this means. Haven't fully grokked reducers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
