On 9 October 2014 15:38, Gary Verhaegen <gary.verhae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have not checked the second edition yet, but when I read JoC, my > understanding was that seq is used specifically for an object that > implements ISeq and is used as such (i.e. by calling first and rest on it) > while sequence denotes any ordered collection. Ah, okay, so they're using "sequence" to denote sequential collections. I guess "sequences" is a better noun than "sequentials" for that purpose. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
