On 9 October 2014 03:55, John Gabriele <jmg3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > * (when calling `seq` on a coll) "...In either case, if the collection > is empty, `seq` returns nil and never an empty sequence. Functions that > promise to return seqs (not sequences), such as `next`, work the same way." > > Hm. "seqs (not sequences)" doesn't make sense to me here. Maybe I'm > misunderstanding, or maybe there's a typo (or mis-capitalization) in there > somewhere? >
To me, that looks like they accidentally wrote "sequence" when they meant "list": * (when calling `seq` on a coll) "...In either case, if the collection is empty, `seq` returns nil and never an empty list. Functions that promise to return seqs (not lists), such as `next`, work the same way." - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
