On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:20:38 PM UTC-5, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > I just want to check that I understand this. Instead of returning and > manipulating lazy-seqs, you compose functions >
yes > (sort of like they way you would in Haskell?) > > which return reqular seqs (non-lazy). > no - they return functions which you can choose to use eagerly, lazily, in a channel, or in other ways we haven't even thought of yet. > So I guess the upside is more flexibility, but you get eager-evaluation. > Or am I misunderstanding something? > You get the choice eagerness (along with many other things). > > kl. 20:01:24 UTC+2 onsdag 6. august 2014 skrev Rich Hickey følgende: >> >> I pushed today the initial work on transducers. I describe transducers >> briefly in this blog post: >> >> http://blog.cognitect.com/blog/2014/8/6/transducers-are-coming >> >> This work builds on the work done for reducers, bringing >> context-independent mapping, filtering etc to other areas, such as >> core.async. >> >> This is work in progress. We will be cutting alpha releases to help make >> it easier to start using core's transducers together with core.async's new >> support for them. >> >> I am very excited about this powerful technique and how we all might use >> it. >> >> Please have a look. >> >> Feedback welcome, >> >> Rich >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
