I just want to check that I understand this. Instead of returning and manipulating lazy-seqs, you compose functions (sort of like they way you would in Haskell?) which return reqular seqs (non-lazy).
So I guess the upside is more flexibility, but you get eager-evaluation. Or am I misunderstanding something? kl. 20:01:24 UTC+2 onsdag 6. august 2014 skrev Rich Hickey følgende: > > I pushed today the initial work on transducers. I describe transducers > briefly in this blog post: > > http://blog.cognitect.com/blog/2014/8/6/transducers-are-coming > > This work builds on the work done for reducers, bringing > context-independent mapping, filtering etc to other areas, such as > core.async. > > This is work in progress. We will be cutting alpha releases to help make > it easier to start using core's transducers together with core.async's new > support for them. > > I am very excited about this powerful technique and how we all might use > it. > > Please have a look. > > Feedback welcome, > > Rich > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
