On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:15 AM, <edw...@kenworthy.info> wrote: > Curiouser and curiouser. > > I turns out the problem was *not* with my next-to-play function but rather > with the fact that it takes three arguments but I was only passing it two. > > The curious part is that whilst the compiler complained about the wrong > arity if I evaluated the call directly, it didn't when it was part of a let! >
Are you able to reproduce this problem with a fresh environment? > > (let [next-player (next-to-play @current-board player)]... > > should be: > > (let [next-player (next-to-play @current-board player false)]... > > But the compiler doesn't complain! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
