I second Gary's suggestion of Om/Reagent. I've used Reagent on some personal projects and really like how easy it is to incorporate to the point where I just don't worry about DOM updates any more, only app logic, data storage and transmission. It's also a bit less opinionated on how you should structure your application's data than Om is. Neither library helps with client/server communication or building APIs on the server side.
Another framework very much in the same vein is Hoplon which aims to cover most of the same bases as Pedestal, but I'd say is a bit easier to pick up and get started with. Brendan On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:03:27 PM UTC-4, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > I'm starting on a new Clojure app, and have been really intrigued by > Pedestal. But it seems to present a new conceptual model to get my head > around. I'm not sure the benefits would be worth the effort for apps that > do not fit the problem Pedestal is trying to solve. > > That said, I'm open to anything. I would really like something that makes > the mundane CRUD tasks easier, and a responsive front end with data binding > and DOM manipulation. > > I'm strongly leaning toward AngularJS, but I'm not sure if I should learn > the native version, or the ClojureScript, or a different ClojureScript > specific framework/library altogether. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
