Nice. On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36:06 AM UTC+1, Jim foo.bar wrote: > > there is really no reason to use `get-in` with keywords/symbols as they > know how to look themselves up...in other words, you don't need to pay > for any polymorphic calls : > > (get-in [:a :b :c :d] someMap) = (-> someMap :a :b :c :d) > > Jim > > On 22/04/14 10:49, Daniel Kersten wrote: > > For navigating nested maps, get-in, update-in and assoc-in with > > keywords seem natural and practical to me. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
