Reusable components - use callbacks
Application components (non-reusable or less re-usable) - use channels

David


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Brendan Stromberger <
brendanstromber...@gmail.com> wrote:

> How can one build up the intuition to know, in what situation, whether it
> would be more beneficial to use callbacks or channels? Are there
> 'rules-of-thumb' that I could follow until that intuition is established?
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 8:40:19 AM UTC-7, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> It's mostly for demonstration purposes, but I think it will be a common
>> pattern when more complex coordination is required. I think components
>> should probably communicate via callbacks and applications can glue things
>> together with core.async if it's beneficial.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Kendall Buchanan <ken...@teachbanzai.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a question about Om's "Basic Tutorial", and perhaps core.async's
>>> role generally:
>>>
>>> The example given in the section, "Intercomponent Communication", uses
>>> core.async for communication between two components. Is this necessary? Or,
>>> is it demonstration? It seems in testing that I can even more easily pass
>>> functions between components as I might a channel, but without go loops?
>>>
>>> I've used React.js to some extent and obviously it lacks Clojurescripts
>>> asynchronous fanciness. Where might core.async excel in Om?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to