2014-04-08 20:49 GMT+02:00 Toby Crawley <t...@tcrawley.org>:

> Does this give you the results you are looking for?
>
> (doall
>   (for [i (range 1 1000)
>         :let [val (Math/sqrt i)
>               diff (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val val)))]
>         :when (> diff 1.1755025E-38)]
>     (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i diff))))
>

It is a lot better. But for every result I get a nil value:
(doall
  (for [i (range 1 10000)
        :let [val (Math/sqrt i)
              diff (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val val)))]
        :when (> diff 1.1755025E-38)]
    (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i diff))))

Gives:
Different for 838 (1.136868e-13)
Different for 3352 (4.547474e-13)
Different for 3674 (4.547474e-13)
Different for 5343 (9.094947e-13)
Different for 7667 (9.094947e-13)
Different for 7863 (9.094947e-13)
Different for 9470 (1.818989e-12)
(nil nil nil nil nil nil nil)


Is it possible to get rid of the last line:
(nil nil nil nil nil nil nil)



> cldwester...@gmail.com writes:
>
> > In common lisp I had the following code:
> > (let (
> >       (difference)
> >       (i)
> >       (val)
> >       )
> >   (loop for i from 1 to 10000000 do
> >        (setq val (sqrt i))
> >        (setq difference (abs (- (expt val 2) (* val val))))
> >        (unless (< difference 1.1755025E-38)
> >          (print (format nil "Different for ~D (~F)." i difference))
> >          )))
> >
> > Clojure works a little bit different. Until now I have the following with
> > comes near the above:
> >   (for [i (range 1 1000)]
> >        (do
> >        (def ^:dynamic val (Math/sqrt i))
> >        (def ^:dynamic difference (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val
> > val))))
> >        (when (> difference 1.1755025E-38)
> >          (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i difference))
> >          )))
> >
> > But beside that this defines the two variables val and difference, it
> also
> > generates a lot of nil values.
> >
> > What would be a better way to do this in Clojure?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cecil Westerhof
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Cecil Westerhof

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to