But yes, we should probably at least put a note in the docs for map<
stating "returning nil from the mapping function can result in undefined
behavior". Or add an assert somewhere perhaps.

Timothy


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:36 AM, James Reeves <ja...@booleanknot.com> wrote:

> This looks like a bug to me. A lot of the internal core.async functions
> rely on nil values indicating the channel is closed.
>
> - James
>
>
> On 7 April 2014 16:26, Alejandro Ciniglio <skiae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Using core.async, I've understood the convention to be that if you take
>> nil from a channel, that channel is closed. This seems to hold for most
>> cases, but I've found a corner case when using map< that lets you pull nil
>> from a channel that is not closed.
>>
>> (def a (chan))
>> (def c (map< seq a))
>> (go (prn (<! c)))
>> (>!! a [])
>> ; => nil nil ;; [one nil is printed, one is returned]
>> (go (prn (<! c)))
>> (>!! a [1])
>> ; => nil (1)
>>
>> This can be chained as well (e.g. (map< identity (map<  seq a)) ), and
>> nils just flow through.
>>
>> From looking at the implementation, it's apparent that this happens
>> because the function application of map happens when taking from the output
>> channel so nil is not technically on the channel, (unless it flows through
>> to another map).
>>
>> Is this a bug or is my mental model of nil => closed incorrect?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alejandro
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
"One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that-lacking
zero-they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs."
(Robert Firth)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to