On 22 March 2014 00:47, Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 22, 2014 12:41:55 AM UTC+1, Andy Fingerhut wrote: >> That is odd. This is a shot in the dark, and probably unhelpful because I >> do not know a good way to verify whether my guess is true, but perhaps the >> seqFrom method went from being small enough to be inlined by your JIT before >> that change, to being too large to consider for inlining after the change? >> It isn't a big change in the code, so it would have to have been close to >> the threshold if this is true. > > if there is anything I can do to test this, just let me know.
You could experiment with different values of -XX:MaxInlineSize and -XX:FreqInlineSize, see http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html You can use -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal to discover what values it's currently using. Additionally differences in -XX:+PrintCompilation ouput might be interesting. Cheers, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
