That's pretty weird. 1.6.0-RC2 is out now - I would really appreciate it if you could give it a shot.
Alex On Friday, March 21, 2014 5:51:14 PM UTC-5, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: > > Hi, > > > after two days of git bisecting and running my tests over and over again, > I give up. While I can repeatedly identify the commit which causes the > biggest slowdown for me between the 1.5.1 tag and 1.6.0 RC1 I simply refuse > to believe that the result of my analysis is correct. > > On 5045ac124e24ed1fe02be86cccca10f7f212a4dc everything is fine, on > 96f5b5bdcae44ccc69e33d701e6188dc2570dadf things are slow. And no, I am not > running into the exception. > > I can only guess that there is some error on my side. I do not think, the > slowdown I reported based upon this program should be no reason to delay > 1.6.0. (Even though I'd still like to understand what's going on.) > > > Best, > stefan > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
