Love it thus far. Big thanks! On Sunday, 9 March 2014 00:39:35 UTC, David Nolen wrote: > > While I think Om's approach to application state management delivers > considerable benefit, I think it would be unfortunate if all the labor put > into reusable Om components was confined to Om users. With the latest > release I've included examples demonstrating how two important things are > now possible: > > 1) Because of the cursor abstraction you can reinterpret the meaning of > transact! For example here is an Om component that can be used from a plain > React component > http://github.com/swannodette/om/blob/master/examples/stateful/src/core.cljs. > No Om requestAnimationFrame render loop or batched updates to be found. > > 2) Because Om components are one step removed from React components, you > can back an Om component with an alternate implementation. For example here > is an Om component that has been forced to write its local state into the > global application state. > http://github.com/swannodette/om/blob/master/examples/harmful/src/core.cljs#L158 > > Together these features offer a better interoperability story for > ClojureScript React users as well as powerful debugging facilities when > coupled with :instrument. > > Feedback welcome! > > http://github.com/swannodette/om > > David >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.