On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:14 PM, John Wiseman <jjwise...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or the equivalent using midje instead of clojure.test > I realize the difference between the two seems small, but conceptually the > latter does more closely match what I'm doing and generates slightly more > useful output (failure names, test counts), and is only not possible because > the designers of the testing libraries didn't consider this use-case (unless > I've missed something).
Interestingly enough, early versions of Midje compiled down to a functional interface. It turned out no one used it, and the intermediate step got to be annoying, so I removed it. There's still a lowest level interface that talks in terms of maps. You could use that, but you'd be the second client (after Midje itself), with all the gotchas that implies. -------- Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/ https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
