> Following your intuition, what would you expect from the following?
> > (map + [1 3 5] '(2 4 6))
> # => ?
>
It only gets worse, as the result of below should be undefined (using
classic set definition):
user=> (map + #{0 1} #{0 1})
(0 2)
user=> (map + #{1 0} #{1 0})
(0 2)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
