On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Andy C <andy.coolw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do perceive sets, lists, vector as atoms which are indivisible (well, > this is not true but this is popular meaning) from semantics standpoint. > Therefore map is just a function which processes them as whole, again from > semantics point of view. Implementation and laziness should not matter > really and we still should get the same result. > Following your intuition, what would you expect from the following? > (map + [1 3 5] '(2 4 6)) # => ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
