> Do you mean *playjure*? No, I did mean *playure* (pronounced player), though after re-reading my post I understand the confusion.
And considering that the current *play-clj* name isn't at all confusing, it's probably a good reason to stick with it! :-) Cheers, James On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:41:56 PM UTC+1, fmj...@gmail.com wrote: > > On 21/01/14 09:50, James Trunk wrote: > > I like the conciseness of the project name, but I worry that it doesn't > roll off the tongue all that well. I guess that *<name>jure* library > names are considered passé by most, but in this case I actually thought > that the name *playure* seemed like a nice fit. Imagine getting to a 1.0 > release and being able to call it *playure one*! Just a thought. :-) > > Do you mean *playjure*? > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
