I just submitted a PR to include Immutant in the benchmarks, per a request 
from Chas on Twitter, and then I noticed Shantanu filed an issue to include 
Undertow, so I created a PR for it, too, since Immutant 2.x will be based 
on it.

The tl;dr is that Immutant performs a little worse than the :gen-class 
servlets included in the benchmarks, and a little better than the Jetty 
Ring Adapter, which is about what I'd expect. Undertow's numbers are just a 
skosh below http-kit, and can probably even be improved since the adapter's 
dep is about 20 betas behind the current release.

Jim

On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:39:13 AM UTC-5, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
>
> You 're right!
>
> ab has many limitations.
>
> Maybe httpload , wrk, Weighttp or ABs  ( several instances of AB)  are 
> better when test client and server do not run on the same computer.
>
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:52:59 PM UTC+8, Feng Shen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,  nginx-clojure looks great!
>>
>> A small tip: ab may not be the best tool, since it's single threaded.   A 
>> better tool is wrk:  https://github.com/wg/wrk
>>
>> You can use wrk to better test nginx-clojure,  It should perform even 
>> better than others.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 沈锋
>> http://shenfeng.me
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Peter Taoussanis <ptaou...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Oh wow, that's fantastic!
>>>
>>> For those watching: Xfeep's fixed a number of config issues, updated all 
>>> the servers, and completely updated the chart.
>>>
>>> Absolutely well worth a look if you're interested in Clojure web server 
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> * Results are here: 
>>> https://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks
>>> * His GitHub page: https://github.com/xfeep
>>> * His nginx/clojure lib: https://github.com/xfeep/nginx-clojure
>>>
>>> Cheers! :-)
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> *Peter Taoussanis*
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/UrRLCdex7d4/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to