Oh, that was just for demonstration purposes. Those vals are actually getting set in a *let* (see here<https://github.com/stefonweblog/stefon/blob/spike-handshake-jig/src/stefon/shell/kernel_process.clj#L95> ).
Tim Washington Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com>wrote: > Using a def inside a defn really shouldn't be done. Perhaps move the > params to a let outside of the s/defn? Or change the def to a let? > > Timothy Baldridge > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Timothy Washington <twash...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hey Jason, >> >> You were exactly right (which is pretty impressive, being that you've >> never seen my code). In my (s/defn ..) form, there was an error that was >> failing silently. >> >> (s/defn [one two] >> ... >> *#_(def params (atom '({}) ))* >> (def params '({})) >> (try (eval `(~afn ~@params)) (catch Exception e (println "Exception: >> " (.getMessage e))))) >> >> >> So the abouve code works. But if I instead use the commented version, >> I'll get an exception. It seems there's a problem passing in a form >> containing an atom to be dynamically eval'd. The error is mentioned on >> these posts (here <http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2009-03-02.html>and >> here <http://www.raynes.me/logs/irc.freenode.net/clojure/2012-09-17.txt#>). >> Is there a way to pass in a form containing an atom to be dynamically >> eval'd? It's pretty important to my architecture, that all functions treat >> that system-atom the same. Any insights are welcome. >> >> *"java.lang.RuntimeException: Can't embed object in code, maybe print-dup >> not defined: clojure.lang.Atom@1c99db7 (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)"* >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Tim Washington >> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Jason Wolfe <ja...@w01fe.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the report. >>> >>> Schema fns inside of go blocks seem to work fine for me. It seems >>> likely that you're seeing an exception inside the go block, which is >>> swallowed by default: >>> >>> user> (clojure.core.async/go (println "A")) >>> #<ManyToManyChannel >>> clojure.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel@46ae10a6> >>> A >>> >>> user> (clojure.core.async/go (throw (RuntimeException.)) (println "A")) >>> #<ManyToManyChannel >>> clojure.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel@427c78c1> >>> >>> Would you mind wrapping the body of your go block in a try/catch and >>> printing the exception stack trace, or posting a gist that demonstrates the >>> issue so I can look into it further? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> On Friday, January 3, 2014 10:21:16 AM UTC-8, frye wrote: >>> >>>> Forwarding... >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Timothy Washington <twas...@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:17 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Core.async, Rules for passing clojure vals to go block >>>> To: Shaun Gilchrist <shaun...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm using Prismatic's Schema in my code base. Now, it looks like >>>> defining some functions with >>>> s/defn<https://github.com/Prismatic/schema/blob/master/src/clj/schema/macros.clj#L453>, >>>> yields some wonky behaviour. Particularly, not running, when being invoked >>>> in a go block. It just fails silently, which is why it was so hard to track >>>> down. Don't yet know why this is happening. But an fyi for the devs and >>>> users of this package. Still love schema, I just need to figure out where >>>> the call chain breaks down. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hth >>>> >>>> Tim Washington >>>> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Timothy Washington >>>> <twas...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Shaun, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Your example does indeed work. I'll have >>>>> to teardown my own code and see where the invocations are failing. At >>>>> least >>>>> I know it's not core.async. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Tim Washington >>>>> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com> >>>>> >>>>> -- >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking > zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C > programs.” > (Robert Firth) > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.