On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jakub Holy <jakub.h...@iterate.no> wrote:
> I also believe that Rich Hickey has some good reasons for why / when not > to use actor-based concurrency. I cannot find the reference now, perhaps it > is mentioned (also) in the StrangeLoop 2013 Clojure core.async > Channels<http://www.infoq.com/presentations/clojure-core-async> > talk. > Does anyone else think we could use a central, searchable clearinghouse containing all of the various arguments, rationales, and philosophical essays underpinning Clojure's design choices in text format? AFAICT a lot of that stuff is currently scattered hither and thither across the web, and a lot of it is buried in the audio tracks of videos where search tools can't find it, and even the videos aren't gathered in one place (e.g. a Youtube channel) but instead are disseminated all over the place across dozens of different hosting sites. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
