Will do. Once the migration is steady (that is, we have a 1.2 and 1.5 environment running concurrently), I'll write a post about the experience and how we will eventually decommission the 1.2 environment.
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 1:48:22 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:23 AM, <solo...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Yes, after looking into this, upgrading the libraries before upgrade the > > Clojure version is unfeasible in our case. I prefer not to keep a 1.2 > > environment around forever but take our time phasing it out to avoid > service > > disruption. I think the dual environment consensus here is the way to > go. > > Please keep us posted on how this goes - I think it's an interesting > case study for what happens with a large legacy code base. > > Fortunately the 1.2 -> 1.3 changes were the biggest we've had to deal > with so far and all the signs indicate we won't have to deal with that > again, so this is a pain that only early adopters will be feeling. > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
