On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu> wrote: > On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Cedric Greevey wrote: >> >> Calling emacs "incidental complexity" is like calling the North Pole "a bit >> nippy this time of year". :) > > The thing is, it's actually possible to have the power of emacs without the > incidental complexity of currently available emacs versions. It has been done > before, e.g. with FRED (FRED Resembles Emacs Deliberately, in Macintosh > Common Lisp). Emacs under the hood, but modern GUI design and usability.
We could all use Aquamacs. :) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
