On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Cedric Greevey wrote: > > Calling emacs "incidental complexity" is like calling the North Pole "a bit > nippy this time of year". :)
The thing is, it's actually possible to have the power of emacs without the incidental complexity of currently available emacs versions. It has been done before, e.g. with FRED (FRED Resembles Emacs Deliberately, in Macintosh Common Lisp). Emacs under the hood, but modern GUI design and usability. -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
