On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Gary Johnson <gwjoh...@uvm.edu> wrote:
> Just to inject another sample into the population: > > As another hacker who lives in Emacs, I found the nrepl -> cider > transition to be quite painless. It took me maybe an hour of reading the > website docs, installing/uninstalling packages with package.el, and > updating the relevant sections of my .emacs.d/init.el file. Not to poo-poo > on anyone's parade, but it really did seem pretty straightforward to me. > Interesting, isn't it, what emacs users consider to be "quite painless". Users of non-legacy tools tend to set the bar rather higher, needless to say, typically expecting upgrading something (other than the operating system itself) to take a few minutes, tops, with most of that spent doing something else while progress meters (first "downloading", then "installing") crawl to 100% and the result working OOTB without manual config changes or other nursemaiding. > So maybe some of the pain points people are feeling have to do with > general challenges with configuring Emacs rather than specific problems > with following the online cider docs. > That much is quite believable. :) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
