Ugh, I meant "negligible impact on the running time versus the current hashing strategy"
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote: > BTW, in the sample set hashing function I provided, > the `reduce +` should have been `reduce unchecked-add-int` > > I've done some timing tests (on a loop/recur version that leverages > primitive math better) and it looks like the strategy I proposed has a > negligible impact on the current hashing strategy, with the benefits of > better hash distribution. > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
