I have another question re types…. I find it hard to express the absence of properties….
Like in Haskell… if you want to display something.. you have to derive Show for that object… which I think is allowing .toString to work Wouldn't it be more helpful to have a type Unshow which stops the object from being shown? There are some things that are universal and it is the absence of that which is unique. Is there a way to model this with types? On 09/10/2013, at 7:58 AM, Joe Smith <j...@uwcreations.com> wrote: > The string concatenation operator in java calls 'toString' on it's args. > > --- > Joseph Smith > j...@uwcreations.com > @solussd > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
