>> "Holy wars are fun for a while (if I wanted to start one on this list, I'd >> go into the superiority of vim over emacs),"
It wasn't me =) Don't get me wrong, I'm not ANTI-type. I'm ANTI-ANTI-untype… which is a much more partial position to take =) On 08/10/2013, at 11:46 PM, "John D. Hume" <duelin.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (cond (hash-map? v) > > > …… > > > > > > (vector? v) > > > …… > > > > > > (list? v) > > > ….. > > > > > > :else …..) > > > > > zcaudate, in what context(s) do you find yourself writing a lot of > expressions like that? I rarely want to allow so much flexibility in > arguments. I'm wondering if there are idioms to avoid it. > I do it for operator overloading/syntactic sugar…. http://z.caudate.me/ova/#indices-selection Also, they are quite useful for macros… https://github.com/zcaudate/purnam As well as custom representation of data and also for traversing nested maps… https://github.com/zcaudate/adi ----------- Chris. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
