Sounds good! I've been having a go with it today in a data-migration thing and I like it. It feels very like clojureql but as you said, it fails earlier with ambiguous queries, which definitely makes debugging easier.
One other difference I did notice with clojureql is that in clojureql the database/connection is part of the query definition `(table db :users)`, where as in clojure-sql the database/connection is a separate thing. This seemed more orthogonal to me, but in practice I found it a bit tricky when working with multiple databases as I kept having to change global state - is there a better way of handling multiple databases using clojure-sql (perhaps I need to write my own query executor...?) A couple more questions (if that's ok) - 1. Are there any known issues/not-implemented-yet bits I might run into when using clojure-sql? 2. What plans do you have for the library going forward? Anyway, many thanks for your work again, and I do hope clojure-sql finds its niche amongst the other clojure sql libraries. I think the relational algebra approach has a lot going for it. Dan > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
