Thanks Alex, I'll keep an eye open on them. mimmo On Monday, September 9, 2013 10:24:08 PM UTC+2, Alex Fowler wrote: > > Well.. reminds me of Scala implicits. When some people think that > implicits hurt the pure essense of good, I found them to be particulary > useful, especially in some scenarios that involved passing many "boring" > arguments. However, with implicits you could run into troubles, hunting > invisible errors of type inference (Scala mark), and i am not sure how > useful such technique will be in a lisp. How the compiler decides between, > say 3 equally valid candidates? These are the wanderings I came into while > I was doing Scala and thinking over the whole matter, but I think that this > is an interesting branch of research for computer languages and would like > to see and know more of the experiments and try them. > > On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:14:14 AM UTC+4, Mimmo Cosenza wrote: >> >> It seems interesting to be watched. >> >> Does anyone already know something about it. >> >> Mimmo >> >> http://www.coect.net/metajs/ >> >
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
